- 固定收益投資組合經理
Skip to main content
- 基金中心
- 投資實力
- 投資見解
- 關於我們
香港, 個人投資者
切換至其他網站
本刊所載見解反映作者於撰文時的觀點，其他團隊可能觀點各異，或會作出不同的投資決策。閣下投資的價值可能高於或低於初始投資時的水平。本刊所載第三方數據被視為可靠，惟概不保證其準確性。
我們的固定收益投資專家就美聯儲維持利率不變的決定，探討下調經濟預測以及資產負債表政策變化對通脹和市場狀況的影響。（僅提供英文版)
Fed keeps policy rates on hold and downgrades economic forecasts
The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) once again kept interest rates on hold at its March policy meeting. In its updated projections, the US Federal Reserve (Fed) downgraded its growth forecasts and increased its inflation and unemployment rate forecasts, with the median Committee member still expecting to cut rates twice by the end of this year. Market participants also continue to anticipate a resumption of rate cuts later this year, based on futures pricing.
The range of outcomes for the economy appears quite wide given policy uncertainty, particularly around tariffs. In his prepared statement at the post-meeting press conference, Fed Chair Jerome Powell acknowledged weaker consumer spending patterns but asserted that the Fed is “well-positioned to wait for greater clarity.”
Labor market coming into better balance
With inflation still elevated at levels that I would describe as uncomfortable for consumers and policymakers, it makes sense for the Fed to stay on hold for the time being, despite the emergence of downside growth risks. We have not yet witnessed material weakness in labor markets, as jobless claims remain stable at low levels and the unemployment rate hovers around 4%. The drop-off in labor demand from weaker growth is likely to be matched by reduced labor supply from immigration policies as well as aging demographics. I expect payroll growth to slow in the months ahead but the steady state of payrolls — at levels that do not raise the unemployment rate — will probably decline to a range of 50 – 75 thousand per month.
Sentiment souring, but are consumers really that miserable?
Developments around global trade, US federal outlays, and the federal workforce have weighed on business and consumer sentiment indicators, suggesting a deteriorating growth and inflation trade-off. The inflation expectations component of the most recent survey from the University of Michigan soared by the most since 1993, raising concerns about potential stagflation. However, the results appear to be politically biased, with Democratic respondents reporting much worse sentiment than Republicans. The misery index, 1 which combines the unemployment rate and inflation, remains well below levels that would raise alarm bells of a stagflationary environment, as actual measures of inflation (as opposed to survey-based) appear fairly well-anchored in the 3% range, still above the Fed’s 2% target.
Some members at odds over balance-sheet policy
The Fed announced a slower pace of the monthly reduction in its US Treasury securities holdings from US$25 billion to US$5 billion. Chair Powell highlighted some earlier disagreement among Committee members about the Fed’s balance-sheet policy, although it sounds like the reduction in pace was very broadly supported. Some considered it appropriate for the Fed to stay the course in winding down its balance-sheet runoff, or quantitative tightening (QT), while others advocated for a pause given potential disruptions from the debt ceiling. Liquidity conditions will likely get a boost with the slower pace of QT and potentially take some pressure off longer-term US Treasury yields. Chair Powell mentioned that the Fed is starting to see signs of tightness in money markets. There is some evidence to suggest that QT is contributing to the relative tightness of supply and demand conditions in the repo market, which makes interest rates more sensitive to changes in Treasury supply.
The change in QT should also ease financial conditions on the margin, which may be welcome to some market participants given the recent equity market sell-off and widening of credit spreads. However, this also threatens to add to existing upside inflation risks. I remain skeptical that the Fed will deliver on market expectations or its own projections for an additional two interest-rate cuts this year unless growth materially disappoints.
1The misery index was created by economist Arthur Okun in the 1970s as an indicator of economic health.
顯示
6
of
6
投資見解文章
高期望與低息差的投資啟示
Connor Fitzgerald探討信貸息差緊窄的影響，以及保持配置靈活對固定收益經理駕馭當前市場的重要性。
2
分鐘
文章
2026-03-31
參考網站連結
相關投資見解
重要披露
在未有威靈頓投資管理明確書面批准的情況下，概不可複製或轉載本刊全部或任何部分內容。本文件僅供參考之用，並非任何人士要約或邀請認購威靈頓投資管理（盧森堡）SICAV基金III系列的股份。本文件所載資料不應被視為投資建議，亦非買賣任何股份之推介。基金投資不一定適合所有投資者。所載見解反映作者於撰文時的觀點，可予更改而不作另行通知。投資者於作出投資決定前，務請細閱基金及子基金的產品資料概要、基金招股章程及香港說明文件，以了解詳情（包括風險因素），其他有關文件包括年度及半年度財務報告。
© 2025 Morningstar, Inc。版權所有。本刊所載資訊：(1) 為晨星（Morningstar）專有；(2) 不得複製或分發；及(3) 概不保證屬準確、完整或及時。晨星及其內容提供者概不就使用相關資訊所引致的任何損害或損失負責。基金的Morningstar綜合星號評級（Overall Morningstar Rating）乃基於經風險調整回報，按三年、五年及十年（倘適用）評級的加權平均得出。過去業績並非將來表現的保證。
由威靈頓管理香港有限公司刊發。投資涉及風險。過去業績並不代表將來表現。本文件未經香港證券及期貨事務監察委員會審閱。
