- Fixed Income Credit Analyst
Skip to main content
- Funds
- Insights
- Capabilities
- About Us
- My Account
The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
Tough times have gotten even tougher for the commercial real estate (CRE) sector over the past month or so, starting with the well-publicized failure of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) on March 10, 2023 — but not all areas of CRE are equally vulnerable to today’s stresses, so finding potential investment opportunities is all about knowing where to look.
As of this writing, we have become more negative on the broad outlook for commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) based on tightening credit conditions at regional US banks. Going into March, CRE was already facing stiff headwinds from substantially increased borrowing costs, declining asset values, and a generally slowing economy. The recent turmoil in the banking sector has only exacerbated these challenges, especially for weaker commercial properties.
Regional banks have historically been among the largest providers of CRE financing, accounting for as much as 70% of such lending by all banks, which equates to nearly 30% of total CRE debt financing. Shrinking credit availability from these regional banks will of course further restrict borrowers’ access to needed capital, making it more difficult to refinance a CRE loan and likely adding to downward momentum in property prices.
At this juncture, we are most negative on office buildings and regional malls — two commercial property groups that were already under tremendous secular pressures and are among the main components of a diversified CMBS pool. We still expect the grim story in the office segment to play out over several years due to the many long-term leases that are currently in place, although we are closely monitoring lease rolls given that vacancy levels are now higher than they were during the global financial crisis (GFC), including for subleased office space.
Similar to previous downturns in the CRE sector (notably, during the GFC and amid COVID-19), we expect loan special servicers to grant loan modifications and extensions to troubled borrowers as long as the latter can demonstrate a willingness to work with the servicers. Still, deal sponsors will likely need to contribute their own capital to help support underperforming assets, which may cause many of them to walk away from the properties (as we have seen with a few high-profile office loan defaults recently).
The special servicer “playbook” was successful during the GFC and COVID-19 because the CRE sector downturns were temporary. The risk case this time around is that the slump could prove deeper and more lasting for the office segment (similar to what we saw in retail), leaving many borrowers reticent to pony up fresh capital. On the positive side, loan maturities have typically been a catalyst for an uptick in defaults, and there is fortunately not a large number of loans scheduled to mature this year.
We believe borrowers who locked in cheap fixed-rate financing at low interest rates will be incentivized to extend their loans in order to buy time for borrowing costs to come down and lending conditions to improve. Borrowers who took out floating-rate loans, however, are already grappling with “payment shock” from higher rates and may thus be hard-pressed to meet the performance hurdles required to extend their loans (e.g., debt-service coverage ratios). Additionally, these borrowers would have to purchase new interest-rate caps for an extended loan period, which have become quite expensive following the sharp rise in rates over the past year or so. These factors could explain why some floating-rate borrowers are opting to walk away from their properties.
Overall, we expect CMBS performance to vary considerably by property type and submarket in the period ahead:
ICE Data, its affiliates and their respective third-party suppliers disclaim any and all warranties and representations, express and/or implied, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose or use, including the indices, index data and any data included in, related to, or derived therefrom. Neither ICE Data, its affiliates nor their respective third-party suppliers shall be subject to any damages or liability with respect to the adequacy, accuracy, timeliness or completeness of the indices or the index data or any component thereof, and the indices and index data and all components thereof are provided on an “as is” basis and your use is at your own risk. ICE Data, its affiliates and their respective third-party suppliers do not sponsor, endorse, or recommend Wellington Management Company LLP, or any of its products or services.
Expert
Securitized credit: Normalizing, decelerating, or falling off a cliff?
Continue readingRate relief: Fed cuts half point, but says “economy is strong”
Continue readingPrivate placements: A primer for corporate DB plans preparing to derisk
Continue readingURL References
Related Insights
Stay up to date with the latest market insights and our point of view.
Securitized credit: Normalizing, decelerating, or falling off a cliff?
Our experts offer their views on the current conditions and outlook for the securitized credit market.
Rate relief: Fed cuts half point, but says “economy is strong”
Our expert explains the Fed's bold rate cut and some key takeaways for investors.
Diving into the new world of credit
Now that spreads have tightened, some investors think it's too late to invest in credit. But this assumption could be standing in the way of earning an attractive income.
CLO equity insights: Private credit
Explore how the convergence of public and private markets is impacting CLO equity, including the unexpected benefit it has driven in recent years.
Private placements: A primer for corporate DB plans preparing to derisk
With many corporate DB plans exploring derisking opportunities, Portfolio Manager Elisabeth Perenick and Multi-Asset Strategist Amy Trainor discuss the potential role that private investment-grade credit, or private placements, could play and consider common questions about liquidity and allocation sizing.
Insurance Quick Takes: US life insurers’ utilization of private placements
In our latest Insurance Quick Takes video, Tim Antonelli discusses research on US life insurers’ use of private placement investments, and shares observations for insurers globally.
Still waiting…Fed wants more data before cutting policy rates
Our expert dives into Fed policy following the July FMOC meeting.
Office to multifamily conversions: Implications for CMBS investors
Our experts explore the emerging trend in some US cities of converting office space into multi-family units and its implications for bond investors.
Chart in Focus: Four key areas of opportunities in bonds amid Fed uncertainty
We discuss four key areas of opportunities in fixed income amid Fed uncertainty in the second half of the year.
Are US election probabilities now a critical driver of bond yields?
Our expert argues that the US election remains a critical catalyst for the bond market given the contrast between both parties as it relates to supply side policies such as trade and immigration, and to policy differences around taxation and regulation.
Time for credit selection to shine
Fixed income investors continue to seek answers to an era of volatile rates. Large, static exposures to credit markets no longer cut it. Instead, a nimble and dynamic approach is more likely to create resilient and consistent total return outcomes.
URL References
Related Insights