- Fixed Income Portfolio Manager
Skip to main content
- Funds
- Insights
- Capabilities
- About Us
- My Account
United States, Institutional
Changechevron_rightThe views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
It’s no surprise that markets are still in a state of flux as we enter the second half of 2024. Several underlying forces are driving the new regime of higher inflation and cyclical volatility, among them, the deteriorating fiscal position in the US, a financial system awash with excess savings and liquidity, and the impact of escalating geopolitical risk on supply chains.
Against this backdrop, it is difficult for central banks around the world to set policy with conviction. At the same time, lags in monetary stimulus are becoming exacerbated, so the cycle of market swings and uncertainty continues.
For fixed income investors, we believe a key implication of this environment has been rising interest-rate volatility. In the US, volatility increased from 4.2% after the global financial crisis to 7.2% following the significant rebasing of US inflation in March 2022.1 Income-orientated strategies that hold large, static exposures to credit markets have felt the unsettling impact of this new era of higher US interest-rate volatility. (Figure 1).
Faced with these market dynamics, it has become increasingly important — as I discussed recently in this publication — to mitigate the risk of volatile interest rates while seeking to capture the opportunities available from the fluctuating performance of the US credit sector relative to US Treasuries. In my view, rotating between US credit sectors and US Treasuries as valuations evolve is a potentially compelling way of navigating this environment.
There are a number of bright spots in the outlook for the US economy. Among various factors, with household wealth looking relatively healthy and these assets generally not overly sensitive to interest rates, a slowdown triggered by reduced consumer spending looks less likely. I therefore see limited scope for downside in investment-grade credit spreads.
More specifically, the resilience of the business landscape reflects a prudent approach by many US corporates in recent years. This began during the pandemic, when companies took out debt and put cash on their balance sheets, akin to an insurance policy. They then chose to pay that debt down when the economy recovered more quickly than expected in 2021. Even before the chance for late-cycle re-leveraging in 2022, the US Federal Reserve started raising rates, so companies cut spending or dividends to protect balance sheets further. The upshot now is, I believe, a strong credit story.
By contrast, with the yield spread for US BB high-yield bonds hovering around 1.8% to 2%, these valuations are less appealing.2 That said, we believe attractive opportunities exist in certain sectors of the market — notably energy, global banking and some utilities — that are still pricing in disruption.
In my view, today’s investment landscape demands a nimble and dynamic approach to credit positioning. In particular, maintaining a higher level of “dry powder” while spreads are tight offers investors the potential to buy on dips when spreads are relatively more attractive.
To capitalise in this way, being selective across sectors counts. I favour issuers with sound balance sheets and positive fundamentals, and then seek the security structure likely to benefit from capital appreciation relative to the downside risk.
Applying this approach, many parts of the US financial sector currently appear attractive and are cheap versus the market on a historical basis. Equally, I prefer taking exposure to large US banks with high proportions of debt – and therefore potentially considered as “riskier” – rather than investing in a lower-rated US industrial name. By contrast, I view high-quality 30-year credit as less appealing amid the significant supply squeeze in that part of the market, which is leading to trades at very tight levels.
Today’s more volatile backdrop is a timely reminder that investors cannot predict the market environment. However, they can control the process by employing a resilient and consistent framework to continually assess the upside and downside risks of every decision and possible price outcome.
By doing so, investors can seek to achieve a more “all-weather”, total return experience and meet varied objectives through their credit allocation, for example:
Above all, I believe that by assessing the range of potential outcomes based on changes in the forward path of interest rates, credit spreads and the broader economic environment, a dynamic and flexible approach to credit investing has the potential to achieve attractive total returns across a range of market environments.
1Bloomberg US Treasury Index, 30 September 2008 – 30 April 2024. | 2The spread quoted shows the yield difference to Treasuries. Source: Bloomberg US BB high-yield Index.
Expert
Are bond investors ready for a US industrial revolution?
Continue readingReframing fixed income portfolios: why bond maths makes the difference
Continue readingBehind the research with Saul Rubin
Continue readingBy
Looking beyond yield: Rethinking the approach of fixed income investing
Continue readingToo much focus on Fed, not enough on fiscal
Continue readingCLOs: 4 hot topics
Continue readingGlobal high-yield outlook: Near term, defensive but longer term, solid
Continue readingURL References
Related Insights
Stay up to date with the latest market insights and our point of view.
You've been subscribed
Thank you for subscribing. You can manage your subscription using the links provided in any of our subscription emails.
Are bond investors ready for a US industrial revolution?
Portfolio Manager Connor Fitzgerald discusses why bond investors should ready themselves for a potential US industrial revolution and shares his perspective on how to reposition portfolios for such a scenario.
Reframing fixed income portfolios: why bond maths makes the difference
It is easy to understand why fixed income investors tend to focus on yields. But investors who focus too much on yield may run the risk of overpaying for income and underestimating the impact of price volatility.
Behind the research with Saul Rubin
Veteran investor Saul Rubin shares a recent example of collaborative active management that reflects Wellington's deep understanding of the global automotive industry and commitment to increasing client value.
By
Looking beyond yield: Rethinking the approach of fixed income investing
Investors face a new regime, challenging traditional assumptions about returns and volatility. With central bank interventions impacting credit markets, it’s time to rethink income allocations. Rather than fixating solely on yield, consider a dynamic approach, presented by Connor Fitzgerald.
Too much focus on Fed, not enough on fiscal
Current US fiscal and monetary policy stances argue for risk taking in fixed income.
CLOs: 4 hot topics
Bank demand, net supply, the cycle for broadly syndicated loans, and loan fundamentals will be front and center for CLO investors in 2024.
Global high-yield outlook: Near term, defensive but longer term, solid
High-yield portfolio managers Mike Barry and Konstantin Leidman discuss their 2024 outlook and the merits of a near-term defensive stance with an eye on longer-term opportunities.
Why income-seeking investors need to look across asset classes
Income plays an even more crucial role in portfolios than many of us realise, contributing a significant portion of returns for multi-asset portfolios. But with cash rates at around 5%, the world of income has changed. This should prompt investors to take a fresh look across asset classes to see where opportunities lie.
Multiple authors
Look past the cycle: The surprising total return potential of natural resources and commodities
Portfolio manager Nick Petrucelli explains the cyclical, structural, and macro tailwinds behind this opportunity.
How would emerging markets weather a “standard” recession?
Macro Strategist Gillian Edgeworth explores the potential impact of a developed market recession on emerging markets.
India equity's improving risk/return tradeoff
This is not your grandfather's India equity market. Equity Portfolio Manager Niraj Bhagwat and Investment Director Philip Brooks explain why and back their argument with risk/return data.
URL References
Related Insights
© Copyright 2024 Wellington Management Company LLP. All rights reserved. WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT ® is a registered service mark of Wellington Group Holdings LLP. For institutional or professional investors only.