- Fixed Income Portfolio Manager
Skip to main content
- Funds
- Insights
- Capabilities
- About Us
- My Account
United States, Institutional
Changechevron_rightThe views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
Despite the bond market’s obsession with whether the Federal Reserve (Fed) will cut rates by 25 or 50 bps at the September Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting, what matters more to markets is where the median FOMC participant believes the policy rate will be at the end of 2025. This insight shows up in the so-called “dot plot.”
At alternating FOMC meetings, Fed officials indicate their expectations for the policy rate over the next three years as well as in the long term. This week, the Fed may make significant changes to the dot plot, compared to just a couple of months ago. At the July meeting, the Fed was indicating only a 50% chance of one cut this year and a policy rate ending 2025 at 4.125%. Today, the market is pricing a 100% chance of the Fed cutting at least once more by December 2024.
Why has there been such an abrupt shift in such a short amount of time? The short answer is a calmer view of the inflationary impacts of the labor market.
In my view, the Fed has shifted its focus to the unemployment side of its mandate because it believes that the labor market is in better balance and is no longer a substantial source of inflation. The Fed’s biggest fear after the pandemic was a return to the wage-price spiral that dominated the inflationary 1970s. Fed officials believe this risk has decreased considerably, so they can revert to their pre-pandemic policy of neutral-rate targeting.
Under a neutral-rate framework, the Fed aims to align its policy rate with the economy’s neutral rate, or the level at which monetary policy is neither expansionary nor restrictive. The longer-term dot is the Fed’s hint as to where it believes the neutral rate will be. This is currently at 2.75%.
This likely explains the U-turn in Fed rhetoric. The recent policy rate of 5.325% is well above the median estimate for the neutral rate and so, in the bank’s view, is overly restrictive. One of the reasons equities have been so resilient despite the slowdown in US growth is because the market assumes that the Fed will quickly get policy rates down to neutral. The market is currently pricing a year-end 2025 policy rate of the same 2.75%.
Getting to that level would require a reduction in the 2025 dot’s position by more than 125 bps. While this is not unheard of, it is unusual, particularly for incrementally minded central bankers. If the Fed does not validate this forward market pricing, volatility could rise. Regardless, while the current parlor game is whether we see a 25 or 50 bps cut, keep your eyes on the 2025 dot, as the destination of policy rates matters as much as the path to get there.
Expert
Fed delivers rate cut, but hawkish 2025 guidance sends yields up
Continue readingGoing their separate ways: Capitalizing on bond divergence
Continue readingMultiple authors
Trump 2.0: Time to curb your enthusiasm?
Continue readingMultiple authors
URL References
Related Insights
Stay up to date with the latest market insights and our point of view.
You've been subscribed
Thank you for subscribing. You can manage your subscription using the links provided in any of our subscription emails.
Fed delivers rate cut, but hawkish 2025 guidance sends yields up
Fixed Income Analyst Caroline Casavant examines the outcome of the December 18 Federal Open Market Committee meeting and the implications for rates, inflation, and real growth.
Going their separate ways: Capitalizing on bond divergence
Our fixed income experts discuss how to position portfolios for a world of uncertainty and divergence, exploring key themes and evolving bond opportunities for 2025.
Multiple authors
Trump 2.0: Time to curb your enthusiasm?
How does an allocator navigate markets when so much about the policy landscape is unknown? Our Investment Strategy & Solutions Group offers their views on the new political realities in the US and their global implications, including for equities, bonds, and commodities.
Multiple authors
Private credit outlook for 2025: 5 key trends
Our private credit experts, Emily Bannister and Sonali Wilson, highlight five critical trends for 2025: the convergence of public and private markets, AI's impact on private credit, the evolving role of banks in lending markets, the impact of higher interest rates, and the importance of financial covenants.
Trump 2.0: US election market impacts
In the wake of the US election, macro strategists Juhi Dhawan and Michael Medeiros join host Thomas Mucha to discuss the market, policy, and geopolitical implications of Trump 2.0.
What is “the economic cycle,” anyway?
See why the relationship between asset prices and the economic cycle is more complex than you might think, why a US recession is unlikely, and what a more dovish Fed could mean for the US and global markets.
By
Can central bank independence survive?
Can central bank independence survive? Macro Strategist John Butler discusses the challenges faced by central banks in an increasingly fraught political environment and how investors should adjust.
By
Chart in Focus: What does the rate cut mean for equities and bonds?
Are rate cuts positive? On the heels of the much-anticipated initial Fed cut, in this article we look to historic precedent for where the markets could go in the coming months.
Multiple authors
Time to capitalise on the evolving role of bonds?
We outline why we think the new economic era is elevating the role of bonds as a source of attractive and stable income, downside protection and portfolio diversification.
Walking a mile in Fed Chair Powell’s shoes
A slow roll on rate cuts by the Fed could frustrate markets and lead to more volatility ahead of the September FOMC meeting. See our take on what to expect for the next few weeks.
By
Massive market sell-off: Justified or an overreaction?
What's behind the global market meltdown, and what should investors consider doing? Global Investment and Multi-Asset Strategist Nanette Abuhoff Jacobson shares her views.
URL References
Related Insights
© Copyright 2024 Wellington Management Company LLP. All rights reserved. WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT ® is a registered service mark of Wellington Group Holdings LLP. For institutional or professional investors only.