The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
As the devastating conflict and humanitarian catastrophe in the Middle East once again underscores, we find ourselves in the most complex, dangerous, and unpredictable geopolitical environment in decades. What do investors need to know while navigating the investment landscape?
These geopolitical challenges will probably continue throughout 2024 and, indeed, for years to come as the Ukraine/Russia war, US/China great-power tensions, growing climate stresses, and other national security issues further impact the global investment, policy, and macro backdrops.
Meanwhile, elevated geopolitical risk around the world is also raising new and important questions about the pace and direction of deglobalization.
In my conversations with global policymakers, it’s clear these jarring geopolitical events are fracturing the global order and, importantly, strengthening a focus around national security — sometimes at the expense of economic efficiency.
As a result, I expect “strategic decoupling” (or “derisking” in the current parlance) to be a key investment theme in 2024, particularly in industries critical to deepening great-power competition between the United States and China.
To be sure, this doesn’t mean “globalization is dead.”
But it does mean policymakers in Washington, Beijing, and elsewhere around the world will seek to protect and promote a growing number of strategic sectors central to establishing economic and military power in coming years and decades.
These “dual-use” civilian-military applications include semiconductors, next-generation communications, critical minerals and a variety of other renewable energy inputs, biotech, space-related technologies, robotics, and automation, as well as artificial intelligence and quantum computing, among others.
In the United States, the CHIPS and Science Act, which is designed to boost US semiconductor manufacturing, is particularly instructive as are stringent export controls and proposed outbound investment restrictions on advanced semiconductors.
That’s because these policy actions can be seen as a potential “blueprint” for how current and future US administrations and the US Congress will address great-power competition across strategic industries — working, wherever possible, with US allies globally to broaden the economic and geopolitical impacts of these measures.
This emerging industrial policy is a long way from the heady days of globalization when policymakers were keen to take a more hands-off approach and to allow markets and companies to more freely allocate capital.
But given the national security imperatives of great-power competition — and the myriad supply chain disruptions the COVID-19 global pandemic revealed — I believe policymakers around the world will remain committed to reducing dependencies in these critical sectors in 2024 and, indeed, beyond.
Given the focus on national security, I expect the global policy environment and markets to be impacted by a number of geopolitical risks in 2024, including:
Other geopolitical risks are also easy to imagine in 2024:
Several key investment considerations come to light amid these ongoing shifts in the geopolitical and policy environments.
First, actively-managed strategies have the potential to benefit from the higher macro and market differentiation that these disruptive policy developments may produce.
Properly marrying the right “bottom-up” analysis with these top-down geopolitical and policy trends is likely to uncover numerous alpha opportunities — at the regional, country, industry, company, and asset-class levels.
Second, several “great-power competition” investment themes will also likely create additional alpha opportunities in 2024, including legacy defense, defense innovation, climate resilience, and decarbonization.
These investment themes and others could well enjoy government spending support for years to come. So, in general, consider whether getting more exposure to relevant thematic approaches should be a bigger part of the investment toolbox as these deepening structural shifts accelerate in 2024.
Lastly, supply chain and other policy disruptions in coming years are in time likely to contribute to structurally higher inflation, and lower global growth, than seen in previous “goldilocks” eras.
These macro implications should also be front and center of investment strategy as geopolitical and policy risk, and accelerating deglobalization patterns, become larger pieces of the global investment landscape.
Equity Market Outlook
In our Equity Market Outlook, we offer a range of fundamental, factor, and sector insights.
By
Andrew Heiskell
Nicolas Wylenzek