- Geopolitical Strategist
United States, Intermediary
Change
The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
A new geopolitical pattern
I believe the current standoff between Russia and the West over Ukraine is part of a global geopolitical pattern of “great-power” competition. As I explore in my 2022 Outlook, the geopolitical backdrop is becoming increasingly unpredictable and dangerous. This shift is driven primarily by US-China rivalry but also other structural factors such as domestic political polarization, and longer term, the growing impact of climate change on national security. In this new geopolitical reality, I think great powers will be more likely to act out of regional and global self-interest, especially in relation to geostrategic issues they consider core to national security. For Russia, Ukraine is such a critical security consideration and part of its wider strong geostrategic desire for cultivating “buffer states.” Accordingly, the Russian invasion threat to Ukraine is real, structural, and rooted in this emerging world order.
Long-term investment implications
I believe this current crisis is only the first chapter in a series of coming territorial disputes/potential military crises — with the most notable flashpoints being Taiwan, the South China and East China Seas, North Korea, and Iran. Investors will need to be ready to navigate the fallout of these crises as well as the shifting policy backdrops that result from increasing geopolitical competition. This more uncertain “new normal” will, in my view, provide structural support for defense spending globally and a continued policy focus on “strategic sectors” that are on the frontlines of shifting military doctrines. I also expect a deepening focus on cyber threats to governments and corporate entities and increased attention to the growing intersection of climate change and national security.
What next?
I think the current crisis is symptomatic of the heightened geopolitical unpredictability that investors will have to learn to live with. The situation is extremely fluid and is likely to remain so over the coming weeks, with the West struggling to decipher Russia’s intentions. The range of potential outcomes is uncomfortably wide, with a real danger of miscalculation by the different actors. I therefore do not think we can exclude the risk of limited physical incursions into Ukraine by Russia. And while the likelihood of a full-scale invasion, in my view, is more limited given the high costs it would impose on the Putin administration, broader geopolitical and geostrategic concerns may trigger a more aggressive military response from Moscow. As for positive indicators, I think the fact that talks continue suggests that some form of de-escalation and a mutually beneficial path forward could still be agreed.
More broadly, I think that at this stage the deepening crisis is a positive for Russia’s geopolitical influence: enabling Vladimir Putin to deal directly with the US, keeping Europe divided, and pushing up energy prices while maintaining Moscow at the center of Europe’s energy needs. What the longer-term outcome will look like is hard to gauge at this juncture. It will ultimately depend on the scale of Russia’s actions and the way the West responds. And the latter is complex. As well as overcoming internal divisions, the US and Europe need to find ways of ensuring sanctions have a real bite without causing too much damage to their own economies. “Nuclear options” such as barring Russia from the SWIFT payment system or sanctioning Russia’s central banks, for instance, could lead to higher energy prices and inflation in Europe and beyond.
The broader investment implications I am monitoring from here onward, include:
- The depth and cohesiveness of the US/European sanctions response to Russian military action;
- The implications for European energy supplies as well as inflation rates in Europe and beyond;
- The likely significant Russian cyber responses to US-led sanctions;
- China’s response to a Russian invasion;
- The geopolitical credibility of the US, especially given its disorderly exit from Afghanistan; and
- The ramifications for the US domestic policy agenda and the midterm elections.
You can find additional context on the year ahead in my 2022 Outlook.
Expert
Related insights
Showing
of
Insights Posts
URL References
Related Insights
Stay up to date with the latest market insights and our point of view.
Read next
Showing
of
Insights Posts
Will proposed corporate governance reforms help to narrow the “Korea discount”?
Could South Korea's Corporate Value-up Program help to narrow the so-called “Korea discount” and build on the momentum gathering pace elsewhere across Asia to improve corporate governance and shareholder returns?
Quick Take
2025-03-31
WellSaid: Partnering with portfolio companies
Co-head of private investing Michael Carmen explores how we partner with portfolio companies to help them along the "last mile from the private market to the public market" including on key ESG issues for private companies to consider.
Podcast
2024-07-31
The value in valuing employees
Companies able to adapt and respond to challenges in the labor market will find themselves well positioned for the future, say Equity Portfolio Managers Yolanda Courtines and Mark Mandel.
Article
2024-03-31
The role of ESG in fintech
Global Industry Analyst Matt Ross and Portfolio Manager Matt Lipton explore the role of ESG in fintech in this clip from their WellSaid podcast episode.
Article
2024-01-31
Sustainable fixed income: Key terms allocators should know
ESG integration versus sustainable investing: What’s the difference? We explain a few key distinctions that are important for allocators to understand.
Continue reading
Quick Take
2023-06-30
Sustainable fixed income investing comes of age
ESG integration and sustainable investing have gained considerable traction in global fixed income markets. Investment Directors Anand Dharan and Meredith Joly and Fixed Income Trader Keenan Choy discuss this ongoing trend and some of its key implications for asset allocators.
Continue reading
Article
2023-06-30
The full climate-investing opportunity
From devastating floods in Australia — tragically, in many of the same areas hit by fires in recent years — to wildfires in Europe and the US, widespread disasters bring into stark reality the consequences today of a changing climate. The human toll of these events has become an unfortunate yet familiar part of the news cycle, but the second-order impacts of climate change on financial markets are sometimes less well understood. Many traditional approaches to climate investing have rightly focused on these risks, but we believe both their approach and their scope are often incomplete and lacking nuance, thereby creating inefficiencies in the climate-investing landscape.
Continue reading
Quick Take
2023-04-30
Stewardship and engagement: 2021 highlights and 2022 goals
Wellington’s long-standing commitment to deep fundamental research and meaningful engagement with investee companies continues to drive positive engagement outcomes that we believe support and enhance long-term investment value for our clients. We are proud of progress we made in 2021 advancing our stewardship priorities, and we have seen many positive outcomes spanning a range of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues. We look forward to continued momentum on ESG and to expanding our influence via active ownership in 2022.
Continue reading
Quick Take
2023-07-31
Ten essential climate questions for private companies
We explore how climate change impacts private companies and share the top questions for companies to be prepared to address as this issue grows.
Continue reading
Quick Take
2022-06-30
URL References
Related Insights