- Head of Next Generation Thematic
Skip to main content
- Funds
- Insights
- Capabilities
- About Us
- My Account
The views expressed are those of the authors at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
A variety of secular trends are spurring innovation and disruption in the global economy and creating what we believe are compelling thematic investment opportunities. In this series of articles, we take a close look at some of these trends, the breadth of the opportunity sets and the related risks.
Here we look at the opportunities that are emerging from a new focus on security, driven by our belief that we are in an environment of accelerating great-power competition and geopolitical instability. We think this will lead policymakers to place a high priority on three different facets of security: national security, economic security and resource security.
Today’s geopolitical environment is the most complex and unpredictable it has been in decades. Geopolitical challenges will probably continue for years to come as the Russia/Ukraine and Israel/Hamas wars, US/China great-power tensions, growing climate stresses and other national security issues further impact the global investment, policy and macro backdrops.
We see three key issues dominating the geopolitical backdrop today:
Elevated geopolitical risk and deglobalisation are the new normal, potentially increasing volatility in global markets while also presenting a long-term positive tailwind to select industries. The result may be disruption and dispersion across regions, countries, sectors and companies, leading to attractive opportunities for active managers.
National governments are preparing for a decades-long geopolitical competition that will span trade, economic policy, global diplomacy and military/defence policy. Great-power competition is already emerging as a US policy framework and will likely continue to be a focus for decades. Other powers, notably Japan, India, South Korea, the European Union, Australia and the UK are also increasingly looking to adjust their strategic stances for a more hostile international environment.
As geopolitical tensions widen, we expect to see spending on defence accelerate (Figure 1), producing a long-term demand tailwind across “legacy defence” and “defence innovation” companies. “Legacy defence” refers to aerospace and defence companies that mostly cater to military and law enforcement sectors. This will be compounded as global security alliances deepen in the coming months and years.
As governments seek to bolster national security, they will invest in emerging technology. Modern defence arsenals increasingly rely on dual-use civilian/military companies for semiconductor technologies, cyber defence and security, as well as cellular and communications infrastructure.
This company produces advanced technology-led air and maritime military equipment, military software, electronic systems, cybersecurity and intelligence, and is seeing robust order backlog on top-of-margin expansions.
A greater focus on national security should lead to more “protection and promotion” of strategic sectors via policy measures, targeted export controls and legislative actions. Strategic sectors that could be a focus for policymakers include semiconductor technologies and artificial intelligence.
It is likely that certain companies will begin to take precedence within specific countries, becoming national champions — enterprises that are afforded a dominant position in a country’s economy thanks to favourable policy. Global supply chains will also be disrupted as governments encourage businesses to “friendshore” with allies rather than rivals.
In the US, the Inflation Reduction and CHIPS and Science Acts serve as examples of legislation intended to support domestic manufacturing and sourcing from US free-trade partners for strategic industries such as clean energy, health care, and the semiconductor supply chain. The EU has responded in kind with similar policies, such as the European CHIPS Act, aiming to help drive resilience in semiconductor technologies.
Policymakers view climate change as a core national security issue, which is underappreciated by markets — a “threat multiplier” further complicating the geopolitical backdrop. Climate change is hitting equatorial and tropical regions the hardest, threatening to exacerbate climate migration, food and water scarcity, agricultural disruption, resource wars, political extremism and health issues. Over the long term, climate change in particular poses a significant risk to food supply and security, as it makes weather patterns less predictable, leading to greater variability in crop yields. Resource scarcity is a concern as well, with the loss of arable land due to urbanisation, industrialisation and reduced biodiversity.
A particular area of focus for governments is access to critical minerals — such as nickel, cobalt and aluminium. These minerals are deemed to be of importance to a range of industries, especially those involved in the transition to clean energy, and inventories are low. The US, China and Russia are already competing for access to these minerals across Latin America, Africa and around the world, and this competition will only accelerate.
Essential to the energy transition and serving as a transitionary energy source, this company commits to achieving zero carbon emissions by 2035 and is leaning towards “responsibly sourced gas”.
These coming disruptions offer significant, long-term opportunities to find winners at the regional, country, industry and company levels; however, there are of course risks to our outlook. Not least is the risk of a major conflict, which is likely to have unpredictable implications on all capital markets — including those outlined in this paper. These “fat tails” mean that the ideal path is likely to be one in which security enhancements are made as we concurrently achieve an easing in global tensions. On the other hand, the seemingly inexorable path of climate change and its impact on national security — without significant intergovernmental cooperation — is likely to continue to create opportunities for companies aligned with this theme.
We believe that with proper management, this structural trend could be a long-term tailwind to select industries and companies, which have the potential to benefit from increased spending, policymaker support and national champion status.
Trump 2.0: US election market impacts
In the wake of the US election, macro strategists Juhi Dhawan and Michael Medeiros join host Thomas Mucha to discuss the market, policy, and geopolitical implications of Trump 2.0.
It’s different this time: Trump faces challenging geopolitical dynamics
Our expert explores how Trump may approach the heightened geopolitical challenges his second administration faces.
Unearthing the unseen in geopolitics
Unearthing the unseen in geopolitics. Watch Geopolitical Strategist Thomas Mucha delve into the investment impact of structural geopolitical shifts and share his latest take on the upcoming US election.
What’s next after Iran’s missile attack on Israel?
Geopolitical Strategist Thomas Mucha shares his analysis of the latest escalation in the Middle East conflict, including his thoughts on a wider regional war and the market implications.
Monthly Market Review — August 2024
A monthly update on equity, fixed income, currency, and commodity markets.
Four investment perspectives amid a pivotal US election
How can investors reposition portfolios for a pivotal but highly unpredictable US elections? Nick Samouilhan explores potential avenues in conversation with three leading portfolio managers.
Monthly Market Review — July 2024
A monthly update on equity, fixed income, currency, and commodity markets.
Harris vs Trump: The foreign policy and investment implications
Our expert examines expected Harris and Trump foreign policies and their potential impact on the investment landscape.
Financial Market Review
A monthly update on equity, fixed income, currency, and commodity markets.
Monthly Market Snapshot — June 2024
A monthly update on equity, fixed income, currency, and commodity markets.
Surprise French election result: what does it mean for investors?
Macro Strategist Nick Wylenzek and Investment Director Thomas Kramer discuss the surprise French election and its implications for European equities.
URL References
Related Insights
Monthly Market Review — August 2024
Continue readingBy
Brett Hinds
Jameson Dunn