- Macro Strategist
Skip to main content
- Funds
- Insights
- Capabilities
- About Us
- My Account
United States, Intermediary
Changechevron_rightThe views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
The deed is done. The Bank of Japan (BOJ) has finally made its long-anticipated pivot out of negative rates. While markets reacted positively to this well-telegraphed move, I think it is far from the end of the matter. In my view, there are four important questions that need answering, with potentially major implications for investors worldwide given Japan’s anchor role in global markets.
At the time of writing, investors appear to believe that the BOJ is largely done, with only one additional rate rise priced till year end. However, I believe that market consensus is at odds with where we are in the cycle. Inflation and nominal growth are holding up, and the BOJ appears increasingly confident that it will achieve its hitherto elusive 2% price stability target. Both observations suggest that the move to neutral territory may be faster than expected. Further downward pressure on the yen could accelerate that process.
In my opinion, the greatest risk to the BOJ successfully exiting its monetary stimulus programme relates to the fiscal implications rather than a potential stifling of the long-overdue economic recovery, even if adjusting to nominally positive rates will be challenging for many companies. Rising yields are likely to severely weaken the balance sheet of the BOJ, as they will erode the value of its extremely large Japanese Government Bonds (JGB) holdings. However, the impact of normalisation will even be more dramatic for Japanese government finances because of higher debt servicing costs, particularly as the government has not taken advantage of higher nominal growth to reduce its spending. Moreover, when the BOJ finally exits its bond buying programme, the government will have to offer higher yields to attract alternative buyers for its debt, further eroding its finances.
It is this exceptionally close relationship between monetary and fiscal policy that makes Japan’s path towards normalisation so treacherous. I believe it will ultimately force policymakers into difficult trade-offs between:
After 25 years of deflation, Japan decided to resort to shock therapy by pursuing a deliberately “reckless” policy. This approach has started to work as core inflation has averaged 3% over the past two years. Yet the public and markets appear not fully convinced yet of the BOJ’s resolve to let inflation run. Arguably, modest rate hikes could even be stimulative given:
While recent readings suggest a decline in core inflation, slowing savings rates, higher wage and capex intentions and, importantly, a pickup in property lending, all point in the opposite direction. If these tentative signs of a shift in behaviour were to strengthen, it could have unintended consequences. This puts the BOJ in an uncomfortable position. If it waits for a significant upswing in bank lending to be certain of success, it could unleash high inflation, which would be socially challenging given Japan’s ageing population. On the other hand, letting rates and yields rise too quickly could kill off the recovery or cause an abrupt upward move in JGB yields.
The potential for instability in JGBs and a further weakening of the yen could undermine Japan’s status as global market anchor and raise questions about debt sustainability. An alternative path to smooth Japan’s exit from its decade-long policy experiment could be to persuade domestic saving institutions to reenter the JGB market. However, such a development would reduce Japanese demand for global assets and remove a key factor that has helped to keep global yields and risk premia low and stable. Data from the Bank of International Settlements suggests that Australia and the euro area countries, especially France, could be the most affected by this reversal in capital flows, which coincides with weakening demand from other high-surplus economies, notably Germany.
Over time, I believe that a successful reset of Japan’s economy may create new opportunities at both asset class and security levels that active investors can exploit.
For now, I think investors should focus on signals that the BOJ may proceed faster than most market observers expect, with the attendant potential for market disruption.
Expert
Monthly Asset Allocation Outlook
Continue readingMultiple authors
Japan’s factory automation sector: Poised for a significant upturn?
Continue readingWhat the yen carry trade unwind could mean for markets and the Fed
Continue readingBy
Time to capitalise on the evolving role of bonds?
Continue readingJapan’s tech sector: Time for a reboot?
Continue readingGovernments have been slow to reduce their fiscal deficits — it could cost them
Continue readingURL References
Related Insights
Stay up to date with the latest market insights and our point of view.
You've been subscribed
Thank you for subscribing. You can manage your subscription using the links provided in any of our subscription emails.
Monthly Asset Allocation Outlook
Wondering how to reposition your portfolio amid election-related uncertainty? Explore the latest monthly snapshot of our Multi-Asset Team’s asset class views.
Multiple authors
Japan’s factory automation sector: Poised for a significant upturn?
Global Industry Analyst Takuma Kamimura explains why he believes we’re on the verge of a multiyear cyclical upturn in the factory automation sector and why he sees a compelling outlook for select Japanese companies in particular.
What the yen carry trade unwind could mean for markets and the Fed
Brij Khurana explains why market participants are likely underestimating how foreign ownership of US assets could constrain the pace and magnitude of the Fed’s cutting cycle.
By
Time to capitalise on the evolving role of bonds?
We outline why we think the new economic era is elevating the role of bonds as a source of attractive and stable income, downside protection and portfolio diversification.
Japan’s tech sector: Time for a reboot?
Japan's semiconductor industry has revived global interest in Japan's tech ecosystem. But we believe the dynamism of Japan's tech sector today doesn't start and end with electronics and semiconductors.
Governments have been slow to reduce their fiscal deficits — it could cost them
Our expert explores the investment implications of continued excessive deficit spending by G7 countries.
Japan equity: Reason to believe
Our expert argues that corporate governance reform and the Japanese economy's escape from persistent deflation have laid the groundwork for a sustainable equity rally.
Should investors prepare for a rate hike in Japan?
Investment Directors Marco Giordano and Masahiko Loo discuss why a rate rise in Japan may occur sooner than markets expect.
Shareholder activism in Japan: Integrating ESG within the investment process
In the final article within our series on shareholder activism in Japan, ESG Analyst Soo Ho Jung shares how the Japan equity team integrates ESG to help realize value for investors.
By
How to interpret the Bank of Japan’s latest policy shift
We analyse the wide-ranging investment implications of the Bank of Japan's latest policy shift.
Shareholder activism in Japan: How our engagement approach drives value
Equity Portfolio Manager Katsuhiro Iwai introduces the Japan equity investment team's approach to engagement, sharing a number of successful recent case studies.
URL References
Related Insights
© Copyright 2024 Wellington Management Company LLP. All rights reserved. WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT ® is a registered service mark of Wellington Group Holdings LLP. For institutional or professional investors only.
Japan equity: Reason to believe
Continue readingBy
Toshiki Izumi, CFA, CMA