How to nurture a growth mindset in a higher-yielding landscape

In a higher-yielding but more uncertain world, where should investors look for growth now? 

The new macroeconomic era will spell more volatility and cyclicality for investors, but it is also likely to generate higher nominal growth. While equities and alternatives are typically considered the most obvious route to capture this potential, higher yields are making fixed income more attractive than it has been in the past — not only for investors seeking income but also for those looking to grow wealth over the long term.   

When thinking about growth through the lens of fixed income, the two most obvious contenders are emerging market debt and high-yield bonds — the fixed income asset classes that have the potential to provide the highest returns for investors. 

Emerging market debt — government or corporate debt from emerging market countries — can be a volatile and complex market but may offer the potential for higher levels of income and capital appreciation than developed market debt. However, there is significant dispersion and idiosyncratic risk. For both local and hard currency emerging market debt, we would suggest that exposures should be built up cautiously over the long term, in line with the specific risk appetite and investment horizon of investors.

High-yield bonds may offer another opportunity to tap into growth. Typically issued by corporates of lower quality, high-yield bonds tend to pay higher interest rates than investment-grade bonds and a well-managed active allocation can play an important role in portfolios. 

Historically able to provide equity-like returns with lower volatility,¹ due to the potential for high and regular coupon payments, high-yield bonds may be a particularly compelling option for investors who are not yet comfortable leaning into equities for growth or who wish to derisk from equities. 

Figure 1

Another way in which the high-yield market has changed, other than the attractive all-in yields now on offer, is its composition. The high-yield market is larger, more globally diversified and higher quality today.

One reason for this is that an increasingly substantial part of the index is composed of fallen angels — investment-grade bonds that have been downgraded to high-yield bonds in the wake of tougher market environments, particularly in 2009 and 2020. As recent arrivals to the high-yield space, this section of the universe tends to be higher quality relative to the rest of the category and can provide fertile hunting ground for active managers. Another reason for this higher quality is that generally, new issuance has been higher quality, and the high-yield market has been more disciplined — many deals that have come to market haven’t been funded in the high-yield market but have instead gone to other markets, such as private credit.²

Given that high-yield bonds are of lower credit quality than investment-grade bonds, investors are often concerned about the potential for defaults, especially as financial conditions tighten. While we think that defaults will move higher in the coming year, we believe they will remain well below that experienced in prior late-cycle periods, and a higher-quality index should translate to fewer defaults overall. It also helps that corporate fundamentals in the high-yield space are generally solid, without any obvious buildup of leverage in particular sectors or excessive growth in credit across the market from broadly weaker underwriting standards. 

The when — patience may pay off but be prepared 

Finding the most advantageous entry point may be less of an issue for investors looking to build a strategic allocation, but we would still advocate a gradual approach. Spreads are below their historical medians, meaning that investors may wish to hold out for opportunities to tactically add exposure at more attractive valuations. 

For this reason, it may make sense to gradually increase exposure and build up a strategic allocation to high yield over time. This may enable investors to capture the attractive yields on offer today while being open to opportunities in the future. That said, it’s also worth remembering that higher all-in yields can provide important protection from potential spread widening.

The how — the benefits of an active approach  

We expect to see continued dispersion between regions this year, and active global high-yield strategies may be able to benefit from opportunities in different economies. Spreads in Europe are currently wider than in the US market, potentially offering investors attractive opportunities to find value — provided the companies issuing them are well positioned to successfully navigate what may be a weaker macroeconomic backdrop.

If investors choose to allocate to high-yield bonds, we think active management is crucial in the current environment. While the high-yield universe is generally higher quality than it was in the past, broadly speaking, company fundamentals are starting to weaken, and defaults are ticking higher. In our view, deep, fundamental credit research coupled with deep sector and ESG expertise provides the most effective way to identify high-yielding companies that are best positioned to outperform over the long term — and avoid companies most at risk of default. 

Source: ICE Data Indices, LLC ("ICEDATA"), is used with permission. ICE Data, its affiliates and their respective third party suppliers disclaim any and all warranties and representations, express and/or implied, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose or use, including the indices, index data and any data included in, related to, or derived therefrom. Neither ICE Data, its affiliates nor their respective third party suppliers shall be subject to any damages or liability with respect to the adequacy, accuracy, timeliness or completeness of the indices or the index data or any component thereof, and the indices and index data and all components thereof are provided on an "as is" basis and your use is at your own risk. ICE Data, its affiliates and their respective third party suppliers do not sponsor, endorse, or recommend Wellington Management Company LLP, or any of its products or services.

¹Source: MSCI, Bloomberg, December 2023. | ²Source: JP Morgan, September 2022.