- Geopolitical Strategist
Skip to main content
- Funds
- Capabilities
- Insights
- About Us
Asset classes
The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed.
The 2024 US presidential election has been scrambled by a series of “black swan” political events in recent weeks. So, too, has an already complex, dangerous, and unpredictable geopolitical outlook — not only by the vagaries of US domestic politics, but also and primarily by a series of geopolitical crises around the world that either a Harris administration or a Trump 2.0 team would have to manage immediately upon taking the oath of office next January.
Here’s a brief look at how either administration would likely address these challenges, and the potential impacts on geopolitical stability, US national security policy, and the markets.
Vice President Kamala Harris has assumed a significant foreign policy role in the Biden administration, meeting with more than 150 global leaders, traveling to 21 countries, and representing the United States at a variety of multilateral events and organizations, including three Munich Security Conferences. She has also attended most meetings of the US National Security Council, and importantly, has been a regular attendee of the President’s Daily Brief meeting, which lays out the key US national security issues of the day and is prepared by the nation’s top intelligence analysts.
In almost every area, the vice president’s foreign policy positions hew closely to President Biden. So, regarding a potential Harris administration foreign policy, we should expect “more of the same” and a continuity of approach and personnel.
This means a continuing focus on strategic sector protection and promotion in industries critical to great-power competition with China, including AI, quantum, biotech, and others (Vice President Harris, in particular, has been a proponent of US export controls and outbound investment restrictions on advanced semiconductors).
It also means a continuing focus on deepening relationships with US allies in both economic and national security areas, including ongoing US support for Ukraine and Taiwan, and increasing reliance on NATO, the Quad, AUKUS, and other traditional and emerging multilateral institutions.
Lastly, it means a deepening focus on climate change, and in particular, the national security aspects likely to accelerate over her administration such as climate migration, rising extremism, and other emerging challenges across equatorial and tropical regions, where climate change is hitting hardest and where many of the current geopolitical hotspots sit.
The one foreign policy area where Vice President Harris seems to differ, at least somewhat and in tone, from the Biden administration is on Gaza, where she has been more vocal in her concerns regarding the plight of the Palestinians (calling the current conflict a “humanitarian catastrophe”), while also offering strong support for Israel.
Vice President Harris’s choice of running mate, too, offers a potential differentiating factor in US-China relations. Minnesota Governor Tim Walz has a strong personal connection with China, including a yearlong teaching stint in Guangdong in 1989 and has visited China more than 30 times. This cultural fluency and perspective may offer additional opportunities for US-China engagement at senior government levels, though Walz’s criticism of the Chinese Communist Party while a member of Congress — particularly on human rights, Tibet, and Hong Kong — may mitigate this.
In brief, I would expect a more transactional US foreign policy, similar to what we saw during President Donald Trump’s first administration, particularly regarding Ukraine and Russia, and including Taiwan.
Using his first administration as a guide, I’d also expect a more hawkish approach toward Iran given the cancellation of the Iran nuclear deal in 2018, and the US assassination of Iran’s top military and intelligence commander Maj. Gen. Qassim Suleimani in 2020.
Trade, too, would likely shape US foreign policy in a second Trump administration. The former president’s promise to levy significant trade tariffs on China — as well as on some US allies across Europe and the Indo-Pacific — would likely be a key feature of a Trump 2.0’s approach to the world and one almost certain to add new tensions to both US-China relations, as well as new frictions with traditional US allies.
Regardless of November’s result and the differing policy priorities of Vice President Harris and former President Trump, the global geopolitical environment will remain challenged — likely for years to come. In such an uncertain national security environment, US leaders and other policymakers across the world will continue to emphasize national security, often at the expense of economic efficiency.
Investors should therefore be preparing for a very different backdrop from previous eras, including selective protectionism as a new normal, a rising probability of structurally higher inflation and interest rates, more differentiated macro cycles, and lower global growth than we saw during the “goldilocks” period of globalization.
On the positive side, these geopolitical and policy disruptions are likely to create a variety of differentiated market outcomes at the regional, country, industry, company, and asset-class levels, offering plenty of opportunities to find winners and losers across actively managed investment strategies.
Last but not least, these structural shifts will also likely produce long-term tailwinds for several national security-related investment themes. They include — but are certainly not limited to — legacy defense and defense innovation, as well as climate resilience and renewable energy, given the close relationship between climate change and rising geopolitical instability.
You are about to enter a website intended for Singapore investors only. Any person unable to accept these terms and conditions should not proceed any further. Before making any investment decision, you shall read carefully the offering documents of each Fund (as defined below).
The use of https://www.wellington.com/en-sg/individual (this “Website”) is subject to the following terms and conditions (the “Terms”). After you have read and understood these Terms, you may click “Accept” to confirm that you agree to the Terms.
By clicking "Accept" you:
(i) expressly acknowledge that you have read and understood the Terms and agree to abide by them;
(ii) represent and warrant that the jurisdiction you have selected is the applicable jurisdiction for the intended investment activities, and that you are not resident in the United States of America and are not a U.S. Person;
(iii) confirm that you are accessing this Website in compliance with the laws and regulations of the jurisdiction you have selected, and all other applicable laws, rules and regulations;
(iv) represent and warrant, if applicable, that you are authorised to accept these Terms and use or access (or attempt to use or access) this Website on behalf of your employer, your client, or both, and that in doing so you are acting within the scope of your duties and, at all times, on behalf of your employer, your client or both;
and
(v) agree to the terms of our Privacy Policy as set out below in paragraph 17.
If you do not agree with these Terms you must refrain from using this Website.
In these Terms, references to “you” and “your” are references to any person using or accessing (or attempting to use or access) this Website. References to “Wellington Management”, “we” and “us” are references to Wellington Management Singapore Pte. Ltd.
By entering this Website, you acknowledge and agree to be bound by each of the following Terms, together with any additional terms and conditions that apply to individual webpages, documents or other attachments contained within this Website (together, the “Conditions of Use”). If there are any Conditions of Use that you do not understand or agree with, you must leave this Website or the webpage in question (as applicable) immediately and delete immediately from the memory of your computer all documents from this Website.
Effective as of 30th September 2021
Chart in Focus: Can this equity bull market last?
Can this current equity bull market last? In this latest edition of Chart in Focus, we focus on the indicators of whether it may come to an end or keep running.
Multiple authors