- Macro Strategist
Sweden, Institutional
ChangeThe views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
With the US government having reached its statutory borrowing cap in January, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen invoked “extraordinary measures” and signaled that the limit must be raised or suspended by early June to avoid a technical default on the government’s obligations. While a specific deadline (the so-called “X date”) is difficult to pinpoint and could extend to September, even that may not be enough time for this badly divided Congress.
In 2011, we saw the cost of debt-ceiling brinksmanship when Standard & Poor’s downgraded its rating on US sovereign debt. Today, a similar outcome is not out of the question: Given the country’s soaring deficits and debt, continued political dysfunction will not be looked at kindly by rating agencies.
Markets are on high alert
The price of US sovereign credit default swaps, an insurance policy against default, has already soared to levels last seen in 2011 — well ahead of the upcoming political battle and a clear indicator of the market’s level of concern.
The 2011 debt-ceiling fiasco may offer a few clues about today’s market risk. Between July and October of that year, US stocks (as proxied by the S&P 500 Index) fell 18%. Gold showed that it can be a good hedge in a debt-cap crisis, performing well during the 2011 episode. On the fixed income side, yields on short-term US Treasuries spiked as the X date approached, a sign of the coming increase in government borrowing costs. However, yields at the longer end moved lower amid concerns about the growth rate of the US economy at a time when other global economies were fragile.
Today, it is less clear whether a similar outcome would result, given that the creditworthiness of the US government is on shakier ground. A lot will depend on what else is happening globally as this potential standoff unfolds. I think it will also be worth watching the impact negative sentiment could have on the repo and commercial paper markets. If “debt prioritization” plans move forward (to bide time, some Republicans have proposed prioritizing certain debt payments) and risk aversion becomes pervasive, the Fed’s repo facility may accentuate an unwillingness to use cash, further constraining market liquidity.
A high-stakes political showdown
Normally a debt-ceiling impasse is broken by good faith compromises and bipartisan cooperation, and President Biden does have a good relationship with House Speaker Kevin McCarthy. But McCarthy will likely have a difficult time controlling his party. While Biden would like a clean increase in the debt cap with no bells and whistles attached, leaving the spending fight for the 2024 fiscal-year budget, Republicans are already demanding that spending cuts be part of the deal as they focus on the deficit and attempt to portray Democrats as wasteful.
In my estimation, McCarthy will need to corral three sets of Republicans in the House of Representatives in order to arrive at a deal. The more mainstream Republicans (about 30%) would like to rein in entitlements but not default; regular MAGA republicans (about 60%) have signaled anger about the size of government and are demanding substantial cuts in spending; and the Freedom Caucus MAGA Republicans (about 10%) say they will hold out for a government shutdown rather than raise the debt ceiling.
It's possible the “blame game” may backfire on the Republicans, as we saw in 2011, when the GOP-led Congress, not Democratic President Obama, received the lion’s share of the blame for stalling the debt-ceiling process. There was a similar public opinion verdict during the 21-day government shutdown in 1995. In recent polls, Democrats have earned a larger share of the blame for the current predicament, but they maintain the upper hand over Republicans. Still, the extreme partisan divide in the US suggests that Republican voters expect their leaders to stand up to the president, making compromise difficult, at least at the outset.
Ultimately, it could be that market discipline is the only thing that will bring the parties to the table, but here are some other possible paths forward, from most to least likely:
- Form a national committee on fiscal spending reductions, like the Simpson-Bowles Commission in 2010, with a pledge for a formal vote.
- Agree on changes to Social Security and Medicare parameters (e.g., retirement age, benefit indexing formula, payroll tax cap) along with military spending cuts.
- Enact a budget freeze or spending cuts of 1% per year and allow tax-cut provisions from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act to expire.
- If members of the House refuse to allow a vote on the debt ceiling, solutions like a discharge petition (a procedural maneuver that would force a vote) or the US$1 trillion platinum coin proposal could be considered. Neither would be easy.
Weighing the economic impact
The economic risks are, of course, substantial. Should debt prioritization be enacted, I estimate the reduction in economic activity could reach US$200 – US$250 billion per month, given the size of the deficit. If transfers were to stop suddenly, the contraction in activity could be amplified by precautionary measures taken by households or corporations.
I’ll be tracking developments and offering insights on this critical front in the coming weeks and months. In the meantime, you can find additional thoughts from two of my colleagues here.
Expert
Related insights
Showing
of
Insights Posts
Listening to voters’ economic concerns should mean less fiscal spending
Continue reading
6
min
Article
2025-11-30
Governments have been slow to reduce their fiscal deficits — it could cost them
Continue reading
4
min
Article
2025-06-30
URL References
Related Insights
Stay up to date with the latest market insights and our point of view.
Read next
Showing
of
Insights Posts
Trump 2.0: Time to curb your enthusiasm?
How does an allocator navigate markets when so much about the policy landscape is unknown? Our Investment Strategy & Solutions Group offers their views on the new political realities in the US and their global implications, including for equities, bonds, and commodities.
12
min
Article
2025-12-31
Listening to voters’ economic concerns should mean less fiscal spending
Fixed Income Portfolio Manager Brij Khurana explains the likely economic and market impacts of Trump administration policies, including potential winners and losers from drastic fiscal spending cuts.
6
min
Article
2025-11-30
Trump 2.0: US election market impacts
In the wake of the US election, macro strategists Juhi Dhawan and Michael Medeiros join host Thomas Mucha to discuss the market, policy, and geopolitical implications of Trump 2.0.
21
min
Podcast
2025-11-30
The revenge of the monetarists
Fixed Income Portfolio Manager Brij Khurana makes the case for a monetarist explanation for moderating inflation.
5
min
Article
2025-06-30
Governments have been slow to reduce their fiscal deficits — it could cost them
Our expert explores the investment implications of continued excessive deficit spending by G7 countries.
4
min
Article
2025-06-30
The Fed’s lessons learned from its COVID response
Fixed Income Portfolio Manager Brij Khurana breaks down the central bank's policy decisions during the pandemic and explains how they continue to affect financial markets.
6
min
Article
2025-04-30
Biden 2.0: National security and investment themes
The geopolitical and investment implications of a potential second Biden term.
5
min
Article
2025-04-30
FOMC: Stable policy amid market volatility
The Fed is holding steady amid market turmoil. See our quick notes on the FOMC's March policy statement, forecasts, and the Fed chair's press conference.
Quick Take
2025-03-31
The Trump/Biden rematch: Market implications of unprecedented policy divergence
Macro Strategist Juhi Dhawan discusses six key areas of policy debate in this year's US election that she expects will matter most to markets, from the tax and spending plans to trade and geopolitics.
Article
2025-03-31
Is the US economy really that different since COVID?
US economists have been touting the resilience of the post-COVID economic rebound. Brij Khurana dissects several key economic indicators to see what's really changed since 2019.
Article
2025-03-31
Too much focus on Fed, not enough on fiscal
Current US fiscal and monetary policy stances argue for risk taking in fixed income.
Article
2025-02-07
URL References
Related Insights