Chart in Focus: The need to differentiate market growth from macro growth

Nick Samouilhan, PhD, CFA, FRM, Co-Head of Multi-Asset Platform
Alex King, CFA, Investment Strategy Analyst
3 min read
2025-09-30
Archived info
Archived pieces remain available on the site. Please consider the publish date while reading these older pieces.
Aerial View Of Spherical Topiary Plant.

The views expressed are those of the authors at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed.

In the last 15 years, economic growth has been booming across emerging markets (EMs), with China and India generating around 10% GDP growth per year. As investments  poured into these markets, investors naturally assumed that this would feed through into earnings per share (EPS) growth, the main determinant of long-term stock market returns. However, macro growth is not market growth (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Growth vs earnings and return

The US and China are the best examples of this dynamic. China EPS growth has stagnated while US EPS growth has been exceptional, despite China’s economy growing at twice the speed of the US. 

Index composition and whether underlying companies are reflective of the economy at large can drive disparities. Within the US, growth has been led by the tech sector, which comprises a lower part of the overall US economy compared to its market cap. These large- cap companies have captured more market share compared to small/unlisted companies.

When EPS is diluted by additional company share issuance, it can further exacerbate this misalignment with GDP growth, which has been a significant drag within China. Index rebalancing toward lower-earning companies has also been a factor in China’s lower market returns. Some of the largest EM ex China markets, such as Taiwan, realized outsized returns relative to GDP growth, as large companies generated most of their earnings abroad, not in the country of domicile.

Investment implications

  • In the medium term, we believe US companies can continue to outgrow the economy. Current levels of innovation and capex do not signal rotation away from the mega caps, and existing market leadership is likely to remain relatively out of sync with the economy.
  • EM ex China economies have delivered strong growth, paid high dividends, and are free from the structural issues that limit its translation to EPS growth. Healthy demographics and “friendshoring” trends of moving supply chains outside of China are positive factors.
  • Focusing predominantly on company fundamentals is critical, but the macro picture is still important, especially for scenario analysis. Exceptionally positive or negative macro outcomes can help to infer tail scenarios for certain asset classes, which may be more helpful to allocators than using macro to understand the central scenario.

What we are watching

  • China industrial policy to boost growth and economic reforms including measures to directly support the market by tightening company fundraising rules to limit share issuance.
  • With tech companies that invest in AI exhibiting explosive growth, market expectations continue to be high. Should capex in AI fail to yield the purported benefits and earnings disappoint, this could bring the US market back down to earth in line with its true economy.
  • Impact of US monetary and legislative policy on EM and China, as higher for longer rates and a strong dollar have been a headwind for EM. The upcoming US election cycle and sentiment on continuing/expanding tariffs and trade restrictions.

Experts

Related funds

Read next

DISCLOSURE

This material and its contents may not be reproduced or distributed, in whole or in part, without the express written consent of Wellington Management. This document is intended for information purposes only. It is not an offer or a solicitation by anyone, to subscribe for shares in Wellington Management Funds (Luxembourg) III SICAV (the Fund). Nothing in this document should be interpreted as advice, nor is it a recommendation to buy or sell shares. Investment in the Fund may not be suitable for all investors. Any views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing and are subject to change without notice. Investors should carefully read the Key Facts Statement (KFS), Prospectus, and Hong Kong Covering Document for the Fund and the sub-fund(s) for details, including risk factors, before making an investment decision. Other relevant documents are the annual report (and semi-annual report).

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein: (1) is proprietary to Morningstar; (2) may not be copied or distributed; and (3) is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. Neither Morningstar nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information. The Overall Morningstar Rating for a fund is derived from a weighted average of the three, five, and ten year (if applicable) ratings, based on risk-adjusted return. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Issued by Wellington Management Hong Kong Limited. Investment involves risk. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. This document has not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong.