Denmark, Intermediary
Changechevron_rightSustainable Investing
Stewardship Principles
Investment Solutions
Funds
The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
The US rating has once again been downgraded below AAA, this time by Fitch. Recall that S&P’s downgrade (also to AA+) in 2011, which followed stalled debt ceiling negotiations, precipitated a spike in market volatility and a flight-to-quality rally that benefited…US Treasuries. The sharp decline in US Treasury yields following that announcement indicated that market participants didn’t question the willingness of the US to make good on its debts and reinforced the status of Treasuries as a safe-haven asset. Today’s market reaction is more muted, with yields modestly higher and some (including Treasury Secretary Yellen) questioning the timing of the decision.
While the timing of Fitch’s decision was never clear, the outcome has been a long time in the making due to constant willingness to pay issues and, more importantly, a deteriorating public-sector backdrop with no credible plan to put it on a sustainable trajectory over the next 10 years. While there do not appear to be many significant forced selling issues due to the loss of AAA status, I think this formal acknowledgment is important for several reasons.
At the margin, this downgrade increases the probability that term premium (extra yield compensation for longer-term bonds) will start to rise due to both ability and willingness to pay concerns at a time when foreign Treasury holdings have been in structural decline.
Critically, there are fundamental reasons for a higher-term premium absent a downgrade, including, but not limited to:
At a minimum, it could increase market focus on the public-sector debt trajectory, which has been ballooning since the pandemic. On a stand-alone basis, this debt burden should be a negative for the US dollar. Other developed market countries also face deteriorating public-sector backdrops, although I think governance concerns due to polarization and constant debt ceiling debates are unique to the US.
The important medium-term question is whether this downgrade represents a catalyst for US Congress to devise a credible fiscal plan. There have been various members of Congress (for example, Senators Romney and Manchin) pushing for such an outcome, but in practice the steps necessary — broadening the revenue base and reducing entitlement spending — are politically unpalatable. Both are politically challenging, especially with an election 15 months away. Neither side has put forward a credible plan, let alone one that would actually reduce debt levels, based on calculations by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.
This said, any signs of progress toward another Simpson-Bowles type of deficit reduction plan would be notable especially as it relates to the long end of the yield curve, which could otherwise be vulnerable to moving higher. If Congress fails to rein in spending and continues to play chicken with the debt ceiling, the backlash in the form of higher borrowing costs from large holders of US Treasuries could be much more punitive than the actions of rating agencies.
Expert
A new economic era: three reasons to revisit bonds?
Continue readingAre US election probabilities now a critical driver of bond yields?
Continue readingBond Market Outlook
Continue readingMultiple authors
Capitalizing on rate shifts: Parsing opportunities in the second half
Continue readingJune FOMC meeting: May disinflation is welcome, but is not enough for a rate cut
Continue readingURL References
Related Insights
Stay up to date with the latest market insights and our point of view.
You've been subscribed
Thank you for subscribing. You can manage your subscription using the links provided in any of our subscription emails.
A new economic era: three reasons to revisit bonds?
Investment Director Marco Giordano explains why he believes the new economic era is creating a wide range of opportunities for research-driven bond strategies to offer investors stable income combined with downside protection and diversification.
Are US election probabilities now a critical driver of bond yields?
Our expert argues that the US election remains a critical catalyst for the bond market given the contrast between both parties as it relates to supply side policies such as trade and immigration, and to policy differences around taxation and regulation.
Bond Market Outlook
Our fixed income experts assess how to capitalize on market volatility with a flexible and dynamic approach that leverages diverse high-yielding opportunities and manages risks carefully.
Multiple authors
Capitalizing on rate shifts: Parsing opportunities in the second half
Fixed Income Portfolio Manager Campe Goodman and Fixed Income Strategist Amar Reganti discuss how to capitalize on potential rate shifts in the second half of the year
June FOMC meeting: May disinflation is welcome, but is not enough for a rate cut
Fixed Income Analyst Caroline Casavant discusses what June's FOMC meeting tells us about the US Federal Reserve’s latest thinking on interest-rate cuts.
Governments have been slow to reduce their fiscal deficits — it could cost them
Our expert explores the investment implications of continued excessive deficit spending by G7 countries.
Bonds in brief: making sense of the macro — April issue
What's driving global bond markets and what are the investment implications? Read the April issue of "Bonds in brief" for Wellington Investment Director Marco Giordano's monthly assessment of risks and opportunities within bond markets.
FOMC: Stable policy amid market volatility
The Fed is holding steady amid market turmoil. See our quick notes on the FOMC's March policy statement, forecasts, and the Fed chair's press conference.
Too much focus on Fed, not enough on fiscal
Current US fiscal and monetary policy stances argue for risk taking in fixed income.
Fed’s projections yielded mixed results this year — what’s in store for 2024?
Our Fed watcher opines on 2023 policy and looks ahead to 2024.
Macro implications of the AI revolution: is the market right?
Macro Strategist John Butler sets out an initial framework to help answer key questions about the potential macro impact of artificial intelligence.
By
URL References
Related Insights
© Copyright 2024 Wellington Management Europe GmbH. All rights reserved.
WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT FUNDS ® is a registered service mark of Wellington Group Holdings LLP.
Wellington Management Europe GmbH. Registered office: Bockenheimer Landstraße 43-47, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. T: +49-69-677761-500. VAT-number DE 326304943 (Umsatzsteuer-Identifikationsnummer) Commercial Register of the local court Frankfurt am Main (Handelsregister des Amtsgericht Frankfurt am Main), HRB 115460 .
Wellington Management Europe GmbH, is authorised and regulated by the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht)
For professional investors and intermediaries only. This content is not suitable for a retail audience.
we’d love your feedback!
Help us improve our website. For every short survey taken, we give 2 to the Wellington Management UK Foundation to support educational charities helping economically disadvantaged children in EMEA.
