- Global Investment and Multi-Asset Strategist
Singapore, Individual
Change
The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed.
As of 14 March 2023
In a matter of days, the cumulative effect of US Federal Reserve (Fed) policy tightening has hit the US banking sector hard, beginning with the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) on March 10.
Panicked depositors in several banks have since rushed to the exits, setting off a liquidity crisis and leaving some banks’ capital positions in precarious shape. The Fed and the US Treasury have taken swift steps to help stabilize the banking system by providing liquidity and assuring impacted depositors that they will be “made whole.” This past weekend, they unveiled several new facilities designed to ease the "liquidity crunch" and to prevent further bank runs.
However, growing investor concerns are sweeping the financial markets: Safe-haven assets have benefited, Fed rate-hike expectations have been all but extinguished, government bond yields are lower and credit spreads wider, and the US dollar (USD) has risen. Meanwhile, global equities are down, with small-cap stocks the big laggards so far.
The situation is evolving rapidly as we speak, as are the potential economic and market implications. At Wellington, we don’t always agree with each other, but we vigorously debate the issues and ramifications. Here are some key points from our latest internal discussions, highlighted by a common theme that there is now a greater probability of a US recession in the near term. Many of us also think investors should consider pivoting to a “risk-management mode” that favors higher-quality assets.
- A liquidity “crunch” is what got us here: The fragile liquidity conditions that started as a “bank run” on SVB have spread to other regional US banks, especially those most dependent on customer deposits. The dynamic basically involves a mismatch between a bank’s assets and its liabilities: Depositors demand their money back (short-term liabilities), forcing the bank to sell securities from its investment portfolio (long-term assets) at large losses (due to the 300 basis-points spike in interest rates over the past two years).
- Liquidity issues can turn into capital issues: Large unrealized losses in some banks’ securities portfolios are likely to be a more widespread problem. These losses have fed into the banks’ concerns around having sufficient capital to continue operating normally. I thus expect robust capital-raising efforts to be undertaken as a next step toward fortifying the US banking industry. Given the size of banks’ portfolios, together with the likely losses caused by rising rates, I estimate that a manageable US$50 billion – US$100 billion of capital will be needed.
- Many banks’ net interest margins and profitability will be pinched: Banks’ cost of doing business will rise in the period ahead, due to increasingly tighter financial conditions and as a direct result of the banks having to raise their customers’ deposit rates. Therefore, I suspect that many banks’ net interest margins will inevitably narrow, as will their profitability in all likelihood. This will be a particularly troublesome issue for the continued viability of smaller, more vulnerable banks that generally have only regional access to customer deposits.
- There could be spillover to broader credit conditions: Since the banking system is at the heart of credit transmission, the challenges facing many banks are likely to have spillover effects, including creating even tighter lending conditions (which had already tightened meaningfully with the Fed’s rate-hiking campaign). A tighter lending environment, in turn, could impact the volume of lending that actually takes place. This is a cyclical risk that could impair the US economy and thus further increases the odds of it entering a recession.
- The Fed is likely to respond as needed: Tighter credit conditions tend to be disinflationary, leaving the Fed room to ease up on the size and pace of its rate hikes. I’m reasonably confident that the Fed will prioritize stimulating growth over fighting inflation if the current banking crisis risks destabilizing the financial system. Markets are currently pricing in barely one 25 bps rate hike, followed by nearly 75 bps of policy easing by year end. However, markets may be disappointed if liquidity-generating measures can contain the damage from recent events.
- What about the rest of the world?: There are clearly different dynamics at play from one global region to another. For example, China’s economy seems fairly well insulated from current US woes, with its economy (and other Asian economies) benefiting from its recent reopening. Europe and Japan may also improve relative to the US, especially if the USD loses some of its luster and the Fed becomes less hawkish. These outcomes will depend, importantly, on whether US liquidity worsens further and restrains global growth.
Investment implications
In the near term, I expect risk-off dynamics to dominate and less risky assets to outperform. Financials and other sectors tied to the economic cycle will likely struggle the most. I also expect large-cap stocks to outperform smaller-cap stocks and growth-style equities to outperform value in the short term. China and other Asian markets tied to China’s recovery are apt to outperform the US and Europe, in my view.
Longer term, I see investment opportunities. Notably, I think quality assets may still be rewarded over time — for example, large money-center banks that have ample capital and have been subject to stricter regulation than smaller banks. Also, some high-quality US fixed income assets may offer relatively attractive yields and total-return potential if the economy softens. A risk is that the Fed’s additional liquidity succeeds in averting a full-blown financial crisis but fans the flames of inflation, thus requiring more Fed rate hikes down the line. This is another reason I suggest favoring quality.
My bottom line: Until this all subsides, proceed cautiously, and be prepared to follow the “higher for longer” investment playbook for inflation and rates in your long game.
Final thoughts
The speed and magnitude of the Fed’s “about-face” from easy to tight monetary policy was bound to expose firms caught on the wrong side of rising rates. That’s precisely what’s happening here, and with the broader financial system now caught up in the turmoil, systemic risks should not be taken lightly. However, the US banking system is generally strong, especially the large, well-capitalized banks, and US regulation is designed to deal with commercial bank failures. I believe the Fed and Treasury will respond decisively to avoid a worst-case outcome.
Expert
Related insights
Showing
of
Insights Posts
URL References
Related Insights
Read next
Showing
of
Insights Posts
Time for bond investors to take the wheel?
Volatility makes bond investing less straightforward, but it can also create opportunities, provided investors are in a position to "take the wheel" in order to capitalise on them.
8
min
Article
2025-11-30
An active investor’s guide to growth equities
Our experts offer their view on the current economic environment, explore best practices for investing in high-quality growth equities, and highlight where they see opportunity now.
6
min
Article
2025-09-30
Massive market sell-off: Justified or an overreaction?
What's behind the global market meltdown, and what should investors consider doing? Global Investment and Multi-Asset Strategist Nanette Abuhoff Jacobson shares her views.
3
min
Article
2025-08-31
Time for credit selection to shine
Fixed income investors continue to seek answers to an era of volatile rates. Large, static exposures to credit markets no longer cut it. Instead, a nimble and dynamic approach is more likely to create resilient and consistent total return outcomes.
5
min
Article
2025-07-31
Three themes (and what they mean) for income investors
With several macro crosscurrents at play, Portfolio Manager Peter Wilke suggests that income-oriented investors not lose sight of the “big picture” in their quest for yield.
Article
2024-08-31
India equity's improving risk/return tradeoff
This is not your grandfather's India equity market. Equity Portfolio Manager Niraj Bhagwat and Investment Director Philip Brooks explain why and back their argument with risk/return data.
Quick Take
2024-04-30
Three macro assumptions that could be just plain wrong
Fixed Income Portfolio Manager Brij Khurana offers his non-consensus take on three entrenched, but potentially flawed, beliefs in today's market environment.
Quick Take
2024-04-30
Wellington investor survey: The bears ponder whether inflation will be too hot, too cold or just right
Conducted prior to the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank, our latest quarterly survey of Wellington investors shows a majority of respondents being more bearish than the consensus view.
Quick Take
2024-03-31
Tight money: Banks feeling the squeeze of higher rates
In this curated collection, some of our experts share their latest perspectives on the ongoing turmoil in the US banking sector and its potential implications.
Collection
2024-03-31
Understanding the US banking sector shake-up
Investment Communications Managers Jitu Naidu and Adam Norman detail recent US bank failures and analyze the implications. (Published 15 March 2023)
Quick Take
2024-03-31
SVB collapse: What are the implications?
Multi-Asset Strategist Supriya Menon shares her latest perspectives on the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank Financial Group (SVB) and the unfolding implications for investors. (Published 14 March 2023)
Quick Take
2024-03-31
URL References
Related Insights
