Hong Kong (香港), Individual

Changechevron_right
menu
search
Skip to main content

Wellington credit total return fund

Credit total return

Wellington US Quality Growth Fund

US quality growth fund

Over 95 years in active fixed income investing

Fixed income

Elevate your investments with Unique perspectives

Elevate your investments
search

Chart in Focus: Cash vs. bond returns in rate hiking cycles

Nanette Abuhoff Jacobson, Global Investment and Multi-Asset Strategist
Patrick Wattiau, Lead Researcher
2024-08-31
Archived info
Archived pieces remain available on the site. Please consider the publish date while reading these older pieces.

The views expressed are those of the authors at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed.

Cash with a roughly 5% yield is a beautiful thing. While it’s easy to get attached to high-yielding cash, holding cash until there’s more certainty in the market environment could cost total return relative to bonds based on the past six interest-rate hiking cycles. As such, investors may want to consider moving out of cash into longer maturities sooner rather than later.

We analyzed the three-year total returns of cash, Treasuries, bonds (as represented by the Bloomberg Aggregate Bond Index), and corporate bonds (as represented by the Bloomberg US Corporate Bond Index) starting from the last hike of each of the past six full US Fed interest-rate tightening cycles since 1980. 

Figure 1
Yied differential

The chart above shows that returns for all the bond strategies we observed were around double the returns of cash. Even though some bonds have lower yields than cash, they've benefited materially more than cash in the past six Fed rate-hiking cycles on average. Corporate bonds outperformed Treasuries and the Bloomberg Aggregate Bond Index due to their higher yield and periods of spread compression, which added net positive return.


Please refer to www.wellington.com/hk/3rd-party-data for disclaimers regarding any third-party data used.

Experts

Read next

DISCLOSURE

This material and its contents may not be reproduced or distributed, in whole or in part, without the express written consent of Wellington Management. This document is intended for information purposes only. It is not an offer or a solicitation by anyone, to subscribe for shares in Wellington Management Funds (Luxembourg) III SICAV (the Fund). Nothing in this document should be interpreted as advice, nor is it a recommendation to buy or sell shares. Investment in the Fund may not be suitable for all investors. Any views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing and are subject to change without notice. Investors should carefully read the Key Facts Statement (KFS), Prospectus, and Hong Kong Covering Document for the Fund and the sub-fund(s) for details, including risk factors, before making an investment decision. Other relevant documents are the annual report (and semi-annual report).

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein: (1) is proprietary to Morningstar; (2) may not be copied or distributed; and (3) is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. Neither Morningstar nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information. The Overall Morningstar Rating for a fund is derived from a weighted average of the three, five, and ten year (if applicable) ratings, based on risk-adjusted return. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Issued by Wellington Management Hong Kong Limited. Investment involves risk. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. This document has not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong.