The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing. Other teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. The value of your investment may become worth more or less than at the time of original investment. While any third-party data used is considered reliable, its accuracy is not guaranteed. For professional, institutional, or accredited investors only.
An alternative version of Mark Zuckerberg’s famous “Move fast and break things” mantra has been making its way around the investment community lately, with the quote being rearranged to read: “Move fast and things break.” This may be trending in conversations because the recent pension-margin squeeze in the UK offers another example of the tendency for rapid changes in market assumptions to expose cracks in the overall financial system.
A story that’s already been written about too much this year has been the fairly mild response from equity volatility measures during this year’s drawdown in global equities. Over the past few weeks, with the markets reaching new year-to-date lows, we’ve started to see evidence of that staid behavior shifting, with equity volatility expectations finally showing some signs of life. I suspect that this “reawakening” may be about fears of larger macro and systemic risks that could rear their ugly heads as we get further away from the cozy low-interest-rate environment of the past decade-plus.
The fact that interest rates are rising isn’t news to anyone, but the speed with which it’s taking place is unusual and is starting to expose some systemic fragilities. Figure 1 displays the rolling one-year change in US rates: Over the past 60 years, we’ve only seen changes of this magnitude a handful of times, with only one period (the early 1980s) that featured a faster pace and the most recent coming in 1994.
Today’s experience of UK pension schemes getting caught off guard by the magnitude and pace of rate changes has some parallels to 1994. Then, too, there were assumptions about rate “stability” that, when proven incorrect, revealed a lot of underlying leverage in the markets. Incidentally, the period leading up to 1994 was, at that time, the longest period on record of stable rate policy by the US Federal Reserve (Fed), with the fed funds target rate remaining pinned at 3% for nearly a year and a half.
Equity market participants are taking notice of the big-picture changes that appear to be brewing of late. Since the Fed’s rate-tightening campaign began earlier this year, global equities have become increasingly inversely related to the direction of real interest rates. It’s seemingly turning into a more macro-/rates-driven market, with sectors and individual stocks moving together in a more correlated fashion. Figure 2 shows that the average pairwise correlation of daily returns for the 10 MSCI USA sectors has been steadily rising, with the first bump higher in correlation occurring shortly after the Fed’s initial rate hike this past March.
And, tellingly, volatility expectations have crept higher in the market: Since last month’s announcement of the UK fiscal plan and the accompanying rise in gilt yields, market “skew” and other long-dormant measures of equity volatility, notably the Chicago Board Options Exchange Volatility Index (VIX), have started to perk up. Don’t be surprised if the market swings become sharper and more frequent in the months ahead.
On previous occasions, I’ve theorized that the already-low risk profile of discretionary investors and a scarce amount of short-volatility exposure in the market have served to limit equity volatility’s responsiveness to potential triggers. Neither of those conditions has really changed. In fact, until quite recently, most hedge funds had been running a lower risk profile than at any other time this year or in the past 12.
This further reinforces the notion that the recent uptick in market volatility likely reflects growing investor attention to and worries about rising systemic macro risks these days. Indeed, the UK pension-margin situation provided a troubling glimpse at how investment structures can “break” when the market assumptions that underpin them undergo radical changes in a very compressed period of time.
Bottom line: Investors have begun to express concern that there may be more such changes to come. In that context, equity volatility may well stick around — and perhaps continue to rise — for a while longer.
The power of local perspective: the long and short of European equity investing
Continue readingImpact measurement and management: addressing key challenges
Continue readingDecoding impact expectations: best practices for impact investors and companies
Continue readingURL References
Related Insights
Stay up to date with the latest market insights and our point of view.
Chart in Focus: Can this equity bull market last?
Can this current equity bull market last? In this latest edition of Chart in Focus, we focus on the indicators of whether it may come to an end or keep running.
What do declining European earnings mean for ECB policy?
European companies have been unexpectedly resilient over the last couple of years. However, the outlook for European earnings could be more challenging than headline numbers suggest. What could this mean for investors?
The power of local perspective: the long and short of European equity investing
Dirk Enderlein and Boris Kergall explain why, in their view, the structural changes impacting European equity markets offer active long/short investors a rich source of potential return and diversification.
Impact measurement and management: addressing key challenges
Our IMM practice leader describes common impact investing challenges and suggests ways to overcome them.
Quality growth — a less volatile sweet spot?
Growth stocks can be volatile, especially when companies fail to meet expectations. However, high-quality growth companies can help mitigate downside risk while still offering potential for long-term outperformance. How can investors find the sweet spot?
Unlocking the full value potential of stewardship
Yolanda Courtines and Alex Davis examine how corporate stewardship can be a source of value and delve into what investors can do practically to maximise its full potential.LDI Team Chair Amy Trainor explains why she believes a pension risk transfer may, in many cases, not be the best choice for fully funded plans from a cost/benefit standpoint.
Decoding impact expectations: best practices for impact investors and companies
We share three recommendations each for impact investors and companies to help them better understand and manage each other's expectations.
Strong fundamentals, attractive valuations: Why the time may be right for active biotech investing
From solid fundamentals to supportive macro conditions, learn why our biotech experts believe the industry may be ready to run.
Navigating AI resource demands: Strategies for sustainable data center operations
AI's growing computational demands are raising critical questions about energy efficiency and water-resource management. We delve into strategies for enhancing sustainable data center operations, highlighting the importance of proactive resource stewardship.
What is “the economic cycle,” anyway?
See why the relationship between asset prices and the economic cycle is more complex than you might think, why a US recession is unlikely, and what a more dovish Fed could mean for the US and global markets.
Japan’s factory automation sector: Poised for a significant upturn?
Global Industry Analyst Takuma Kamimura explains why he believes we’re on the verge of a multiyear cyclical upturn in the factory automation sector and why he sees a compelling outlook for select Japanese companies in particular.
URL References
Related Insights
Chart in Focus: Can this equity bull market last?
Continue readingMultiple authors